Blog

Conference alert: iam2013 Interdisciplinary Approaches to Multilingualism

iam2013 Interdisciplinary Approaches to Multilingualism

August 15-17,2013

University of Calgary

http://www.ucalgary.ca/iam2013/

Conference alert

Symposium Towards a Learning Society:
Supporting teaching and learning quality in Vietnam Conference

22nd   to  23rd August 2013
Hanoi, Vietnam

Website: http://www.vvob.be/vietnam/?q=en/symposium
Contact person: Ms. Tuyet Anh Dang

The symposium provides platform for education sector stakeholders to share national and regional lessons learnt and best practices of promoting quality of education to recommend policy on further enhancement of education quality in Vietnam

CSSE Intersection Scenarios Symposium Preview 12: Advocacy for Immigrant Teachers

Systemic advocacy for immigrant teachers: At the intersection of “isms”

From 2005-2011, I helped oversee a bridging program for internationally educated teachers (IETs) offered at the University of Manitoba. The program involved university coursework required to meet certification requirements, practicum placements, professional development and networking, and customized language support.  The program was premised on an equity mandate that promoted a more diverse teaching force and recognized the many attributes of internationally educated teachers.

One of my roles was to chair advisory committee meetings with key stakeholders, including school division liaisons (often superintendents), ministry representatives from education and immigration, NGO service providers, and teacher education colleagues from the Faculty of Education.

Discussions at the bi-monthly meetings were intense and often controversial. Committee members had different levels of investment in issues facing IETs—some were part of this committee because they were immigrant teachers themselves and spent years trying to move an equity agenda forward; others were new to issues facing internationally educated teachers and had been assigned to be part of this committee by their school divisions.  The issues presented below were raised by different stakeholders at advisory committee meetings over the duration of the program, though not all of the issues arose at the same meeting.

Key stakeholders raised questions and concerns such as:

  • “Why should we support an initiative to integrate immigrant teachers when we have other hiring priorities, such as employing more male teachers in elementary schools?”
  • “What is being done to ensure the IETs’ language is up to par?  Parents will complain if their accents are too strong.”
  • “Those of you [two female coordinators] promoting this program just won’t let up—you pursue your goals like pitbulls.”
  • “When given the choice between hiring a 50-year old immigrant teacher and a 23-year-old graduate from a Manitoba Faculty of Education, I would hire the 23-year old grad in every case.  Parents want young and energetic teachers.”
  • “I’m not sure why we have a Ukrainian teacher and a Filipino teacher placed in our school—we don’t have any students from those backgrounds.”

 

To learn more about this scenario, including the author’s own response, please attend the Intersections of Diverse Teachers and Diverse Learners at CSSE 2013, or stay tuned to the DiT website because we will be posting those details in the near future.

Until then, please leave a comment so that we can read your responses to this scenario. Here are some questions to consider interacting with each other and the author (Dr. Clea Shmidt, from the University of Manitoba) about:

  1. What assumptions are reflected in each comment?  
  2. What “isms” come across in the various viewpoints represented?  
  3. What challenges arise in doing advocacy work at the systemic level? 

 

Image Source and Photo Credit

CSSE Intersection Scenarios Symposium Preview 11: Collaboration Challenge

Why is she behaving this way?

 As a professor at the University of Toronto, I work with graduate and undergraduate students of different ages and religious, ethnic and racial backgrounds. As such I often meet with my students in small groups to support their developing skills as researchers. I encourage them to work collaboratively and help each other in reaching their goals while sharing their concerns and questions about the research process.

Although I strongly encourage a spirit of collegiality among my students, I have observed that not everyone is equally comfortable in the context of these group meetings. In fact one day, after one of our regular meetings, one male student asked “Why is she behaving this way?” in reference to a student he perceived as particularly guarded during the meeting.

His question made me wonder about my role as the facilitator of such a diverse group. I wondered if it would be a good idea to review the norms for interaction at meetings and emphasize the group as a “safe” place for expressing diverse views as well as concerns or questions. I wondered what role culture, and gender played in this situation and how I might work with both students involved to ensure they benefitted maximally from their involvement in our regular group meetings.

 

To learn more about this scenario, including the author’s own response, please attend the Intersections of Diverse Teachers and Diverse Learners at CSSE 2013, or stay tuned to the DiT website because we will be posting those details in the near future.

Until then, please leave a comment so that we can read your responses to this scenario. Here is a question to consider interacting with each other and the author (Dr. Antoinette Gagne, from the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, at the University of Toronto) about:

  1. How would you address such a situation? 

 

Image Source and Photo Credit

CSSE Intersection Scenarios Symposium Preview 10: Cultural Knowledge

Incorporating diverse learners’ cultural knowledge in the classroom

Culture is far deeper than the externally obvious components of celebrations and festivals, food, clothing and language. Culture is how we see, understand and interpret the world around us. Our background knowledge is based on our cultural worldview. Learners often bring knowledge to the classroom that is very different from that represented in the textbook.

For example, you are teaching a unit on modes of transportation in a metropolitan area of North America. Your class is made up of 40% immigrants and 60% locally born students of various ethnicities including mother tongue speakers of English. In preparing the unit on modes of transportation you want to build on the background knowledge of all the learners in the classroom rather than limiting the lesson to the textbook representation of bicycles, motorcycles, cars, buses, trucks, trains, boats, ships and airplanes. Your predominantly Asian learners are also aware of other modes of transportation such as jeepneys, bullock carts, calesas (horse drawn carts), rickshaws, kuligligs (rototiller–turned-tractor with trailer used for transporting people, animals and produce), tantalaks (homemade gravity propelled carts), bangkas (a boat larger than a canoe with outriggers) etc. as well as various animals used for transportation.

To learn more about this scenario, including the author’s own response, please attend the Intersections of Diverse Teachers and Diverse Learners at CSSE 2013, or stay tuned to the DiT website because we will be posting those details in the near future.

Until then, please leave a comment so that we can read your responses to this scenario. Here is a question to consider interacting with each other and the author (Diane Dekker, from the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, at the University of Toronto) about:

  1. How could you activate the learners’ prior knowledge, build on background knowledge, and support identity development in this particular unit?

 

 

Image Source and Photo Credit